Controversies Surrounding Bulk-Purchase of Freeholds and Problems for Leaseholders Afterwards
- Ashley Barwick

- Nov 27
- 5 min read
A couple of weeks ago, I was sat in my local having a pint with my cousin. He's buying a house in Sheffield. He's having a few issues with the leasehold side of things.
Leasehold houses are far more common in the North of England than in the South. Here in Sheffield, much of the land was historically owned by wealthy families, aristocrats, or institutions - those in the steel industry in particular. I always take great pleasure in telling those of a more aloof predisposition that I was raised on the Duke of Norfolk's Estate. That's certainly true. It was also the 10th floor of an inner city high-rise block of flats.

Instead of selling the land outright, the land owners granted long leases (often 99–999 years) to developers and buyers. This allowed landowners to retain control and generate ongoing income while still enabling mass housing development, primarily for the steelworkers. Recently, my friends in Portsmouth wanted suggestions for their daughter who was moving to Sheffield and were totally perplexed that 40% of properties here are still leasehold. Estate agents in the city often reassure buyers that leasehold ownership is “normal” locally and doesn’t carry the same stigma it might elsewhere.
The landscape of the UK property market has seen several shifts over the past few years, particularly concerning the bulk purchase of freeholds by investment companies and third parties. This practice has raised numerous controversies, impacting thousands of leaseholders.
So back to the pub conversation with my cousin. It was overheard by another friend. His freehold had just been purchased without his knowledge by an infamous solicitor known for buying freeholds in bulk. And then letters started arriving with demands. Not just to this friend, but others in the area that had had the freeholds purchased in this manner by the same person.
You can read all about it here.
In this blog post, I will delve into the issues surrounding this trend, discuss its implications for leaseholders, and highlight why this is becoming a growing concern in the property market.
Understanding the Bulk Purchase of Freeholds
The process of bulk purchasing freeholds usually involves large investment companies acquiring multiple freeholds from developers or private landlords. These investors often aim to maximise profits through increased ground rents, leasehold services, and other associated fees. While this practice can provide a windfall for sellers, the consequences for leaseholders can be dire.
For instance, leaseholders might experience sharp increases in their ground rents, making their properties less affordable over time. The negotiations for lease extensions can become more complicated and costly, creating an air of uncertainty for homeowners.
Impact on Leaseholders
The most pressing issue facing leaseholders is the escalation of ground rents after investment companies acquire their freeholds. Many leaseholders entered agreements with ground rents set at a fixed rate, but nothing protects them from increases initiated by new freehold owners. In fact, some companies have aggressively raised ground rents, leading to financial strain for many families.
According to the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, around 4.5 million properties are currently leasehold in England and Wales. The issues have become so prevalent that there are now calls for government intervention. Increased ground rents can render properties almost unsellable, creating a dilemma for leaseholders who wish to move on.
Lack of Transparency
Another significant concern is the lack of transparency in the transactions involving bulk purchases of freeholds. Leaseholders often find themselves in the dark about who owns their freehold and the terms that govern their lease. When freeholds change hands, communication may be limited, and leaseholders might not be informed about updates that could affect their rights and obligations.
This lack of information can lead to frustration among leaseholders. It's essential for homeowners to have clear lines of communication regarding crucial aspects such as ground rent increases and leasehold extensions, yet many find themselves without support or clarity after a bulk purchase.
Difficulties in Extending Leases
Extending a lease is often a complicated process, made even more challenging when a freehold is sold en masse. The process can involve lengthy negotiations, and when leaseholders don’t have the right to purchase the freehold collectively, they may find themselves at the mercy of the new owner.
The Landlord and Tenant Act of 1985 enables leaseholders to extend their leases, but the complexities involved can lead to delays and increased costs if the freehold is held by a faceless investment company. Lease extensions can often involve hefty fees, adding financial pressure on leaseholders who might already be struggling under increased ground rents.
Challenges in Purchasing the Freehold Collectively
Given the difficulties encountered by individual leaseholders, some may contemplate buying their freehold collectively. However, this route presents its own challenges. For one, reaching a consensus among multiple leaseholders can be a cumbersome process. Each homeowner may have diverse financial situations and varying motivations, making collective action tricky.
Moreover, investment companies often set high prices for the freehold, putting it out of reach for many leaseholders eager to take control of their home’s future. The companies are not usually transparent about their asking prices or the justification behind them. This opacity only exacerbates feelings of helplessness among leaseholders, leading some to argue that they are being taken advantage of.
Real-World Implications and Growing Concerns
The implications of these issues can be severe for leaseholders. Properties can lose value, and long-term residents risk losing their homes to financial pressures driven by escalating costs. The growing number of leaseholders struggling with these challenges has resulted in a rise in campaigns and petitions aimed at reforming leasehold laws.
The UK government has begun to acknowledge these concerns, historically reactionary to public pressure. As more leaseholders come forward and share their negative experiences, the demand for comprehensive reform will likely gain momentum. There are indications that lawmakers may take steps toward making the buying of freeholds more accessible, as well as limiting how much ground rents can increase.
Exploring Solutions
While the controversies surrounding bulk purchasing of freeholds remain a pressing issue, there are practical steps leaseholders can take to protect their interests. Firstly, it’s crucial to stay informed about their rights as leaseholders. Resources such as the National Leasehold Campaign provide valuable guidance and support for those navigating these complexities.
Moreover, forming or participating in a leaseholder group can strengthen collective efforts to negotiate with freehold owners. This enables leaseholders to have a united front, which can be more effective when addressing ground rent negotiations or pursuing a collective purchase of their freehold.
Raising awareness through local and national campaigns is another essential strategy. Engaging with local representatives and participating in discussions about leasehold reform can help push for necessary changes in legislation.
In summary, the trend of bulk purchasing freeholds by investment companies presents numerous challenges for leaseholders in the UK. While the case for reform is building, leaseholders must remain active and informed, working together to navigate this complex landscape.
Understanding the intricacies of their leasehold agreements and staying updated on the current political landscape can empower leaseholders to advocate for their rights effectively. As pressures mount, continued dialogue and action may ultimately lead to a more equitable property market for everyone involved.
Have you or anyone you know been affected by a freehold purchaser? Drop a comment below.




Comments